Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you are unlikely to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 mins to learn more.
Analysis
6 min read

Value for money in the transfer market?

One man’s bargain is another’s rip-off: in player transfers, value for money is always subjective. But what does the data say?

  • Premier League clubs acquired players for 31% more than valuation on average
  • Clubs in La Liga got the best value for money and sold on at a premium
  • Defenders command the highest fee premium at 21% over valuation

In this most unusual of years, there has been much speculation on how football’s transfer market – one of the most criticised aspects of the modern game – would respond to the financial constraints imposed by Covid-19.

In a world of unprecedented health crisis, economic downturn and rising unemployment, we might expect the wealthy clubs of European football to be mindful of a potential public backlash if they spend tens of millions on a rising 18-year-old starlet. Perhaps the bigger question is whether those clubs can afford to burn through precious cash piles as profits plummet, even accounting for the ability to pay in tranches and a likely reprieve on FFP. As this shorter-than-usual transfer window nears its close, we look into a topic that might become more of a concern for clubs whose ability to spend freely in the player market has been constrained by revenue losses and reduced cash flows: value for money.